>>>>> "WC" == Winter Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WC> To me the following seventeen seems acceptable, at least as long
WC> as there's certainty that the "abused" additional key/value pair
WC> doesn't clash with class functionality, and it even circumvents
WC> the evaluation order thingy:
WC> sub new{bless{0,@_},$_[0]}
my double reverse thing has the same flaw. but i don't think the extra
key/value is legit (being the judge of this contest :).
uri
--
Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com
--Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding-
Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
