Hi All,

'Trust' and 'Conversation' implements the WS-Trust and WS-Secure
Conversation specifications.

Status right now:
WS-Trust impl is in the process of being re-done.
WS-Secure Conversation impl will be re-worked burning the
WS-Addressing stuff into it once we have the components of WS-Trust
impl ready.

Introps:
The SecurityTokenService successfully interoped with IBM's impl last
year (Token issuance only). But as of now we cannot confirm
interoperability due to the changes. :-(

Therefore I think for the 1.0 release we will have to exclude
WS-Secure Conversation and WS-Trust impls from it.

As for the release note/README I suppose we should only include
'trust' and 'conversation' as experimental.

Thanks
Ruchith

On 7/9/05, Werner Dittmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear fellow contributors for WSS4J,
> 
> it's time to do a release for WSS4J :-).
> 
> Most of the job is done, the ant-targets for the distributions
> are set up, the tests are up and runing, the buglist is nearly
> empty, no real show stoppers known.
> 
> However, some action items remain:
> 
> - pls crosscheck if the ant targets for the distribution also
>    include your parts. That is the parts for Trust and
>    Conversation
> 
> - pls indicate about the state, interops done so far, or no
>    interops done so far, you interop partners and so on
> 
> - give some info about the topic, e.g. what does "Trust" or
>    "Conversation" really do, which specifications you
>    implemented, etc.
> 
> - do you need additional libraries, support software (additional
>    to what the base WSS4J implementation needs)? If so also
>    include a link where to get the software
> 
> - any other information about you part (Trust and Conversation)
>    that could be of value for the users.
> 
> Pls provide this info and send it to the list (using the Subject
> above). As I get the info I compile it into a README file. If
> necessary also a release note could be prepared. Please indicate
> which info shall go into a README, and which part into a release
> note.
> 
> Regards,
> Werner
>

Reply via email to