On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 09:13 AM, Jeff Drummond wrote: > Laurent Daudelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> That sounds good, but for those that are speeding up their cache, how >> would >> you rate the increased performance? > > Minimal. > > I've experimented with my 500 MHz pismo, running the cache at both 200 > MHz > and 250 MHz, but I never noticed any difference (at least for the > types of > things I use it for--web browsing, Office, some photo processing). > > YMMV, of course. > > -Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --
I tried the same thing with the same result. I found no perceptible difference between 200mhz and 250mhz cache speeds. -- G-Books is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-Books list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-books.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-books%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
