on 9/27/01 2:15 AM, Michael Bryan Bell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Oh yes there is something wrong with it. :) If you were doing serious print > design (maybe you are, if so I apologize) then you would know about the bugs > pagemaker is rife with compared to quark 3.3.2. > > There is a reason why print people still use that version religiously > (admittedly quark 4 isn't bad now that its patched) and that�s because it is > consistent and it works, especially printing to film or direct to plate.
I work for a large metropolitan daily, and we still use Quark 3.3.2 on Macs as do all of the other papers in our chain. It is stable not only in itself, but also with QPS (Quark Publishing System). Quark 4's QPS system, from what I hear, isn't anywhere near as stable. We print direct to plate. -- Candace Sherriff [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shebob.com -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! <http://www.applelinks.com>
