File Maker has been relational since vs. 3.0; before that, no. Best regards, Dana
On 12/4/04 11:36 AM, Maaki of [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent > My guess would be to use FM 4.1, since it has some relational > capabilities, and FM 2 is flat file only. However that is only a > guess, since I don't use FM. There are some good FM lists though > where you should get some very knowledgeable responses. > > > To subscribe, E-mail to: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Archives:<http://www.listsearch.com/fmprotalk.lasso> > > > ===================================== > ---At 4:21 PM +0100 12/4/04, Larry le Mac wrote:--- > >> A few weeks ago I asked about FM II and newer versions. >> I have now located FileMaker 2 Pro which can convert the >> database file intact. However, I have a problem: >> >> Which is the best, and why: >> >> FileMaker 2 Pro or FileMaker 4.1 Pro running on an >> iMac rev. B with Mac OS 9.2.2 ????? -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
