I'd not like to recommend Erich Maria Remarque's 1929er "Nothing New in the West" on gas-impregnated static warfare, but I guess the Nuremberg funnel technique of selling/rejecting the not-present (like the emperor's new clothes) is not exactly an amazing scholarly methodology.
:-(
_Dierk
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <g-megillot@McMaster.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: P.S. Re: [Megillot] falsifying methodology; 3 cases; etc.
P.S. I could address further claims in R. Gmirkin's latest post, and will, if
seems useful.
And corroboration and coherence and chronological-suitability, for instance,
are all among important aspects of worthy proposals.
But I would like to state more clearly than I did before that the Qumran mss
also offer some new information on history, including information not
available already in, say, Josephus, and the other currently available
sources--some things not previously known--and that Qumran texts also help
illuminate some of those sources.
best,
Stephen Goranson
_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
_______________________________________________ g-Megillot mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
