[Adding `g-wrap-dev'] Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Indeed, calling the release 2.0 might be a good idea, now that I've > dropped my initial 2.0 goal of supporting more than one Scheme impl. If you merge the `aggregated' thing, you'll also be able to merge all the documentation improvements that ended up in those changesets. And if we are to call it 2.0, I think I'll try to go ahead and write more documentation. Personally, I consider having a well-documented, highly flexible and customizable, and _stable_ binding generator for Guile to be the top priority. It'd be nice at some point to release a 2.0rc so that the GNUcash and guile-gnome folks can make sure everything works fine. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ g-wrap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/g-wrap-dev
