Hi, Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The other side of me thinks that inlining unwrap code into generated > functions is wasteful. It would be nice to be able to use RTI for > everything; as a side effect, we use G-Wrap's namespacing, not C's, and > we simplify code. As another side-effect, we make G-Wrap-generated bindings even more inefficient. :-) "RTI" moves part of the burden from compile-time to run-time. While this could be nice if the compilation/code-generation phase were effectively _completely_ removed, it is a questionable choice as long as code-generation is needed at all. We'd trade performance for little in return. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ g-wrap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/g-wrap-dev
