On May 28, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
> > <http://db.xbench.com/merge.xhtml?doc1=365967> > > This is over 16% faster for Tiger than Leopard! > > Across all models, PPC Macs are at least 20% faster using Tiger over > Leopard. > > GeekBench scores are similar to Xbench, so they confirm each other's > validity. And my experience running 10.5 on my 1Ghz Powerbook, doing what I do with my computer, it's perfectly fine. Benchmarks should only ever be guidelines, not hard and fast rules. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
