Bugs item #1680857, was opened at 2007-03-14 10:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bharat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1680857&group_id=235
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: win32 Group: 2.0.0 beta 6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Ben (sp00kz) Assigned to: Daniel Atallah (datallah) Summary: Memory leak in gaim-2.0.0beta6 Initial Comment: There seems to be a memory leak in gaim-2.0.0beta6 that does not effect usability, but continues to eat up resources until the system starts paging. Windows XP SP2 Fully Patched, Gaim Idles at ~30 MB ram until you start IM'ing people, and then ive seen it go all the way up to 400+MB. 4msn accounts, 3aim, doesn't seem to matter which sorting method (there use to be a leak with sort by log size) or which account has the Messaging window open. Reverted to gaim-2.0.0beta5 and this seemed to fix the problem, but AIM accounts showed up as '(unknown) account type' until you reset them. Any other info I can provide? Thanks Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bharat Mediratta (bharat) Date: 2007-03-16 23:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=42211 Originator: NO I'm seeing the same behavior with 2.0.0beta6 on WinXP. Right now, my Mem Usage is at 77M and my VM Size is 630M. Let me know if there's any other useful info I can provide. Debugging Information Plugins: Enabled SSL: Gaim was compiled with SSL support. GTK+ Runtime: 2.10.7 Glib Runtime: 2.12.7 Library Support Cyrus SASL: Disabled Gadu-Gadu library (libgadu): Internal GtkSpell: Enabled GnuTLS: Disabled Network Security Services (NSS): Enabled Perl: Enabled Tcl: Enabled Tk: Enabled ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben (sp00kz) Date: 2007-03-16 07:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=944565 Originator: YES When I reverted, i used the same GTK+ Version, 2.10.7 Tab placement is 'on top' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Atallah (datallah) Date: 2007-03-14 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=325843 Originator: NO Are you using the same GTK+ version as beta6 (2.10.7) (Help-About) when you revert to beta5? Do you have your Tab Placement somewhere other than "on top"? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben (sp00kz) Date: 2007-03-14 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=944565 Originator: YES Assigned Group ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1680857&group_id=235 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Gaim-bugs mailing list Gaim-bugs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-bugs