Bugs item #1218147, was opened at 2005-06-10 06:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gaul
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1218147&group_id=235
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: v1.3.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: L W (warp9pnt9)
Assigned to: Ethan Blanton (eblanton)
Summary: IRC "people in room" list with nonexistent/stale nicks
Initial Comment:
VERSION: Windows 1.3.0
NOTE: I just got 1.3.1 (released last night) and
haven't had a chance to test, but didn't see anything
related get fixed in the ChangeLog.
PROBLEM: When people leave the channel with some error, I
get duplicate names that include user mode op character. I
have made a very self-explanatory (I hope) screen shot, but
there's no way to attach here. Perhaps differnt servers
send different part messages, or none at all on ping
timeout?
ENVIRONMENT: IRC channel which has had 4 people for the
most part, with some bots entering and leaving a few
times an
hour. The bots leave no duplicates as they have no
opps and
leave normally, not by timeout errors, etc..
Note: Leading @ and ! are user op modes and should
normally yield a green star in replacement of the @ or
! in the
"people in room" list. But the stale names have ! as part
of the name, not a green star.
Currently three people in the room: @Atlan, !smurf_uk,
warp9pnt9.
Atlan and warp9pnt9 give user info normally, so are not
shown.
User BigWillyStyle42 got a timeout. He should not be
listed
in the channel because he is not there. Also has leading
exclamation mark (!BigWillyStyle42) as listed in GUI
instead
of a green star.
User !smurf_uk (as listed in GUI) behaves just like
!BigWillyStyle42, no such nick. I am sure smurf_uk had a
timeout disconnect at some point and reconnected after a
brief time.
User (green star) smurf_uk (as listed in GUI) appears and
responds correctly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Andrew Gaul (gaul)
Date: 2007-04-09 00:47
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=139865
Originator: NO
The problem seems to be that some IRC servers, specifically Undernet, use
two different formats for part messages depending on the part message:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PART :#CHANNEL
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PART #CHANNEL :part message
Freenode uses a consistent format:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PART #CHANNEL :
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PART #CHANNEL :"part message"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Ethan Blanton (eblanton)
Date: 2007-01-28 11:43
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=298616
Originator: NO
This should be fixed in 2.0.0 final. Let me know if it is not.
Ethan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100235&aid=1218147&group_id=235
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gaim-bugs mailing list
Gaim-bugs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-bugs
