wow. I guess http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74620 makes it clear it is not us.
Thanks for finding out. Well GTK+ was always like that, and especially in Windows it is more untested. The problem is not if GTK was better when Gajim started, but if there is a real alternative open source solution for a stable and extensively tested GUI. And there isn't, because open source does not give enough money back for such a mechanism to exist. GTK in Linux "just works" so it's acceptable allover as such. if you are a python fan, then the best GUI for Windows is wxPython and you can have a look at IronPython speaking to MS SWF (.NET). On 1/6/07, Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Nikos, > > Friday, January 5, 2007, 11:44:59 AM, you wrote: > > > yes and unfortunately if you have this everytime, I advise you to look > > for this problem in GOOGLE or in bugs.gnome.org under GTK+ in case > > it's been reported. [which I bet it has] > > Looks like it's been reported 6 times since 2002 (bugs 371288, 376779, > 351617, 344826, 329356, and one fix attempt in 74620. > > > in any case, this doesn't seem to be a bug from our side (at least as > > far as I can say) > > Yeah, that looks true. > > > GTK (and especially on Windows) sucks. More on why > > http://blogs.gnome.org/view/timj/2006/12/20/0 [and this talks about > > Linux too! imagine Windows.. :/ {AFAICT, only one guy hacks on > > Windows}] > > Was gtk+ better when gajim was started, then? I do really like gajim > (partially because I'm a python fan), but the gtk+ is getting on my > nerves. > > > if u have evidence it is us, inform us though. > > Will do. > <rest snipped> > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Gajim-devel mailing list > Gajim-devel@gajim.org > https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel > _______________________________________________ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
