Hi Kanwei,
I think we'll get more feedback once it when it is added to Galaxy. I
have run small tests (included in the functional tests) and real large
datasets and have had no issues with the scripts and wrappers.
Regards,
Florent
On 27/05/11 18:49, Kanwei Li wrote:
Has anyone on the list tried this patch? Feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks,
K
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Florent Angly
<florent.an...@gmail.com <mailto:florent.an...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can anyone comment on my email please?
Florent
On 22/05/11 14:03, Florent Angly wrote:
Let me know if you have any questions about this.
Thanks,
Florent
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Request for pulling the updated FASTQ (de-)interlacer tool
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:47:13 +1000
From: Florent Angly <florent.an...@gmail.com>
<mailto:florent.an...@gmail.com>
To: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu
<mailto:galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu>
<galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu> <mailto:galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu>
Dear Galaxy team,
Please consider pulling these changes I made to the
interlacer/de-interlacer tools into the main Galaxy repository:
https://bitbucket.org/fangly/galaxy-central/changeset/7f7ec8f05d36
While the tools were handling mate pairs fine, I now added the ability
to also keep single reads (reads that miss their mate) in a separate
file. The functional tests were updated and pass.
Thanks,
Florent
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
