Edward, I've marked your hmmscan repository as deleted so it will not longer be displayed. I can undelete it if requested by anyone.
Peter, I've left your deprecated repositories alone, so they are still accessible. I'll mark them deleted as well if you want. On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Edward Kirton wrote: > i gave it a bad name previously and peter didn't find it in a search at > first, but i couldn't change the name, so i created a new repository. i put > a note in the old repo (hmmscan), referring to the new repo (hmmer). that > may suffice. however you folks how you want to handle it is fine. > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Greg Von Kuster <g...@bx.psu.edu> wrote: > Hi Ed, > > Do you want the hmmscan repository itself deleted? It's been downloaded / > cloned 86 times, although it is never been automatically installed into a > local Galaxy since the contained tool does not properly load into Galaxy. We > generally do not like to delete things like this because doing do prevents > reproducibility. I'm looking for feedback from the community on this one - > does eliminating this repository affect anyone? > > Thanks for the new contributions tot he tool shed! > > Greg Von Kuster > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:47 AM, Edward Kirton wrote: > >> i created a new toolshed repo, hmmer since i couldn't rename it. as >> suggested, it has the hmmscan/hmmsearch as one tool, plus hmmpress. will >> add hmmbuild, hmmalign asap; others upon request. >> >> dave, is there a way to delete an old tool? (hmmscan) >> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Edward Kirton <eskir...@lbl.gov> wrote: >> great suggestion; i'll make those changes >> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Edward Kirton <eskir...@lbl.gov> wrote: >> > hi, peter - i will fix the description and upload hmmsearch and infernal >> > today. >> >> Great. >> >> Assuming hmmscan and hmmsearch have (almost) the same command >> line API, there is something to be said for presenting them as one tool >> in Galaxy, with a drop down selection between them (with help text >> about which is recommend adapted from the HMMER blog post). One >> could even have an automatic selection by a wrapper script based on >> the number of query sequences and the number of HMMs. My thinking >> here is the detail of hmmscan vs hmmsearch is purely an implementation >> detail that the end user shouldn't have to worry about. >> >> Or just duplicate most of the XML code and have two wrappers. But >> as far as I know there isn't (yet) a nice way of reusing XML snippets >> between tool wrappers... which would be handy. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" >> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this >> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: >> >> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ > >
___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
