Ok - that change was made. The difference is that the change is applied to the task instead of the job. It's in changeset 7713:bfd10aa67c78, and it ran successfully in my environments on local, pbs, and drmaa runners. Let me know if there are any problems.
Thanks again for your patience. -Scott ----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jorrit Boekel > <jorrit.boe...@scilifelab.se> wrote: > > Is it possible that you are looking at different classes? > > TaskWrapper's > > finish method does not use the job variable in my recently merged > > code > > either (line ~1045), while JobWrapper's does around line 315. > > > > cheers, > > jorrit > > Yes exactly (as per my follow up email sent just before yours ;) ) > > Peter > ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
