On dimanche 12 octobre 2008, Doriano Blengino wrote: > Benoit Minisini ha scritto: > > May be I am wrong... but it seems to me that you are sometimes critic > when replying to me. I know, I am more critic than the average users on > this list, so we are paired... >
Don't worry, I'm not "critic" at all. It just that talking by e-mail often looks like as if people are always critic. And english is not my primary language, so I often just fill my answers with information only! > > On dimanche 12 octobre 2008, Doriano Blengino wrote: > >> Benoit Minisini ha scritto: > >>> On dimanche 12 octobre 2008, Doriano Blengino wrote: > >>>> Kari Laine ha scritto: > >>>> > >>>> If you look carefully at the docs about EXEC: > >>>> > >>>> [ _Process_ *=* ] *EXEC* _Command_ [ *WAIT* ] [ *FOR* { { *READ* | > >>>> *INPUT* } | { *WRITE* | *OUTPUT* } } ] [ *AS* _Name_ ] > >>>> > >>>> you'll notice that you can't specify both READ & WRITE --------^ > > This syntax says you can not specify a couple of words. May be this > could be better: > > Form1: > [Process=] EXEC Command [ WAIT ] [FOR {READ | WRITE}] [AS Name] > Form2: > [Process=] EXEC Command [ WAIT ] [ FOR {INPUT | OUTPUT | {INPUT > OUTPUT}}] [AS Name] > > This takes in account that specifying READ & WRITE does not work, if > that will be verified. > > > Some processes need to be run in a virtual terminal, but most of them > > don't, and you should not have problems with them. > > Don't know anything about that, anyway, I think /usr/bin/tr should be > one of those which don't need a terminal, being a 'true' filter. > > > So please be give more details (i.e. some source code!) when you say that > > they "just don't work". > > I sended the project two messages ago, and you replied to it; probably > you didn't notice the source code attached. Probably I forgot it between all the e-mails I try to deal with! > I send it again; run it; click on the togglebutton, look both at the > textarea and the gambas console. > Then stop it, change "INPUT OUTPUT" to "READ WRITE", and run it again. > That will tell you who is wrong. I may be wrong, because of my old 2.0.0 > version that, by the way, runs smoothlessly and I am in love with... :-) > > > Note that processes that don't need virtual terminals, can be run with > > them without problems. But you are adding a useless heavy layer then! > > I have so many books around I can't find that book I was talking about > (and it was a *big* one! :->), but I am pretty sure that it was > describing this argument. I am not sure, and I would like to read again, > but I can remember that it is not so simple to get both stdin & stdout > from another process. Indeed. You can look at the source code if you dare. :-) It is in the gbx_c_process.c file. > > Tell me what your tests say to you - this is very interesting because I > did not try if that book was true or not. > > Regards, and happy coding, > Doriano I will look at it. Regards, -- Benoit Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user