And so, a new copy of references to objects still point the objects
---------- Original Message ----------- From: Benoit Minisini <gam...@users.sourceforge.net> To: mailing list for gambas users <gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:59:52 +0100 Subject: Re: [Gambas-user] An other OO problem. > On lundi 19 janvier 2009, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: > > If I have understand concept correctly, I think this; > > http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb/object%5B%5D/copy > > is little misleading. > > "Returns a deep copy of the array." > > Objects copied with this method doesn't seem to be deep copied > > (shallow copy instead). > > > > > > Jussi > > > > I wanted to mean that the returned array is a new object, and that the array > contents is copied. But if the array contents are object references, objects > are not copied (there is no way to tell Gambas how to copy objects), only the > references are. > > Is "shallow copy" really the right term then? > > -- > Benoit Minisini > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user ------- End of Original Message ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user