On Thursday 19 November 2009 09:52 am, Toni wrote: > If NC or NC are choosen then the resulting Creative commons license > can't be considered a free license. Further I think that some people > won't consider as a "valid free license" a Creative commons with > condition of Attribution (BY).
The CC-BY license is essentially a BSD-style license for non-code uses, and CC-BY-SA is meant as a copyleft like the GPL, though it's fundamentally less stringent because it doesn't require source materials to be provided (I've been looking for that kind of license for my music for years and no one has come up with one, probably because of the difficulty in establishing what constitutes source materials for artistic works). As far as BY goes, there are no CC licenses without attribution anymore, see here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user