> I apologize if I gave you the wrong impression. I didn't intend for you > to change anything. I was just wondering if it could already be done and > I was missing it. > > I really like Gambas and have been enjoying the learning experience. > Thanks for creating it. >
No, you really shown me that there is some incoherence between OPTIONAL syntax and the way argument are used in inherited constructor. So I think I will invert that for Gambas 3, despite it will need a little bit of CPU for that. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
