I wasn't very accurate... I couldn't reproduce random missed events either.
Just missing Key.Code.
I think that Key.Text behaviour should be consistent between GTK+ and Qt.

Jussi


2010/4/13 Benoît Minisini <gam...@users.sourceforge.net>:
>> Using Gambas 2.20, Ubuntu 9.10 with KDE 4.3.5 and GTK+ libraries
>>
>> Key.Code is not returned? Key.Text is lost? KeyRelease is not raised?
>>
>> Put a TextBox in a Form, then write the code to catch the pressed key.
>> Run it and press a number o letter key.
>>
>> PUBLIC SUB TextBox1_KeyPress()
>>   PRINT Key.Code
>>   PRINT Key.Text
>> END
>>
>> PUBLIC SUB TextBox1_KeyRelease()
>>   PRINT Key.Code
>>   PRINT Key.Text
>> END
>>
>> Result Tests (gb.qt)
>> ----------------------------
>>
>> pressed the '5' key
>>
>> KeyPress: Key.Code = 53, Key.Text = "5"
>>
>> KeyRelease: Key.Code = 53, Key.Text = ""
>
> Key.Text is not guaranteed to be set during a KeyRelease.
>
>>
>> Randomly KeyRelease wasn't raised.
>
> Please specify, I didn't notice any problem about that.
>
>>
>>
>> Result Test (gb.qt)
>
> I think you meant gb.gtk instead.
>
>> --------------------------
>>
>> pressed the '5' key
>>
>> KeyPress: Key.Code = 0, Key.Text = "5"
>
> Yep, this is a bug I fixed in revision #2891. I'm almost sure that it worked
> before, so maybe a recent change in GTK+ made my code fail.
>
>>
>> KeyRelease: Key.Code = 53, Key.Text = "5"
>>
>> Randomly KeyRelease wasn't raised.
>
> Please specify, I didn't notice any problem about that.
>
>>
>>
>> Issues in two real proyects (I'm trying to isolate the problem):
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> KeyPress never is raised when gb.gtk is used.
>
> No, it is raised, but Key.Code was zero.
>
>>
>> KeyPress sometimes is not raised when gb.qt is used.
>
> As I said before, I didn't notice that. So if you can tell me how to reproduce
> it, it would be a great thing.
>
>>
>> Key.Text is lost when the event KeyRelease is raised.
>
> It is actually not lost, it is just that it should be set only during a
> KeyPress event. gb.gtk is just more clever there.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Benoît Minisini
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user

Reply via email to