Le 08/08/2012 21:13, Emil Lenngren a écrit : > I finally managed to compile the main components (compiler/interpreter) and > run the benchmark "primes" (takes 430 seconds, compared to 20 seconds for > standard x86). > > What I don't like is the reconf-scripts. Even for components that take ~10 > seconds to compile, I first have to run the ./reconf script (3 and a half > minute) and then the ./configure script (takes about 1 and a half minute), > for each component. So for most components (most components are small), > more than 95% of the time is configuration... > > Question: Is it possible to throw out the autoconf scripts and use > something faster instead? > > /Emil >
For information, the multiple configuration scripts (one by component directory) was a request from Jose R. Rodriguez that made Gambas Debian binary packages. I don't know if he still make them, because I had no answer from my mail to the mailing-list of Debian packagers of Gambas claiming that their packages are incorrect and do not work. But this is another story. As for the build system: what could I use that can make Gambas compile on Linux, FreeBSD, MacOSX, x86, x86_64, armel and armhf? -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
