On 2013-11-04 06:38, François Gallo wrote: > I don't care to have a lot of users from Windows or OS X who use Gambas > :-) . This is not my goal. My goal is just to be able to run Gambas > applications without imposing choices.
Well, we can debate whether a given port should or shouldn't happen until we're blue in the face, but none of it matters until someone writes the code! Others have tried Windows ports before but never got very far. It's just not going to be a priority for those of us who have been running nothing but Linux for a decade or more. I was interested for a few years when I had clients with heterogenous desktop environments, but cross-platform desktop development has largely moved to the web. I'd be more interested in seeing an Android port, yet not interested enough to try it myself (so far). Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
