I realise that modifying the enumerated set during a For Each loop is fraught
with danger but I do have a situation where this is "necessary". The following
is a very simplified mock up of an anomaly in gambas that I am seeing. The
real situation is complex, I'll explain it later in this post.
The following code shows several variants of changing the enumerated set during
the loop. (I could have also attached a source archive, but its probably
quicker to just paste this in a new project main module.) The simulation is
simply a "rocket launch count-down" .
Public Sub Main()
Dim aTest As String[]
Dim sItem As String
' Run 1: Simple enumeration (obviously works)
aTest = ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"]
aTest.Reverse
For Each sItem In aTest
Print sItem
Next
Print "Blast off"
' Run 2: Nullify the whole array during the enumeration (continues as if
enumeration is working on a copy)
aTest = ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"]
Debug aTest
aTest.Reverse
Debug aTest ' prove that this is not duping the`array
For Each sItem In aTest
Debug aTest
Print sItem
If sitem = "8" Then aTest = Null ' but the enumeration continues???
Next
Print "Blast off"
Print aTest = Null
' Delete (all) elements within the enumeration
aTest = ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"]
aTest.Reverse
For Each sItem In aTest
Print sItem
If sitem = "8" Then
aTest.Delete(0, aTest.Count) ' leaves a non-null but empty array, the
loop exits once this has been executed
Endif
Next
Print "Blast off"
End
Run 1 is just a simple enumeration, no changes are made to the set during the
loop (sanity check !).
In Run 2, when the count gets to 8 we nullify the entire array. However, the
enumeration loop still continues and includes all the elements from the
original array???
In Run 3, when the count gets to 8 we delete the entire array. Now the
enumeration stops at that point. This is what I would expect in Run 2???
In our real situation, we receive a bunch of xml "packets" (a packet being a
complete xml document) that are queued for processing in such an array. Quite
often, the list of packets to be processed includes duplicate, or earlier,
versions of some information relevant to a specific entity identified within
the packet. So once we have processed the latest version, hence the array
reversal, all packets containing earlier information regarding that entity are
irrelevant.
In the real code we don't actually delete or nullify the queue array, but use a
separate routine to remove the elements in the array that are no longer
relevant, sometimes this will empty the reversed array entirely (or at least
the rest of it). Now, as the Run 3 example works as I expect, i.e. the loop is
"truncated", generally everything is fine. But, there are uncommon, but not
infrequent, situations where the entire array can be nullified, this is what
scares me as the code that handles this entire mess is spread out over multiple
tasks and such like.
So, shouldn't the Run 2 loop truncate like Run 3?
regards
Bruce
--
B Bruen <bbr...@paddys-hill.net>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
