2015-12-14 18:38 GMT-04:30 <wi...@develop.earthshipeurope.org>: > It would be good if those developing would 'now and then' take some time > to check if their developments are at least minimal documented. > All that takes is creating the missing page, without any further > documentation added, so it will at least pop up in the help.
That's a good point, those develop a module must also develop their repective documentation and woul be great if the documentation can be autogenerated (or updated) from the svn/git gambas code itselft this will solve the problem.. so for updates from users: the release can retrieve the wiki changes and updated the code in gambas! of course this wil be a lot of work.. one direction can be: only symbols will write in the wiki, and the rest are made by users! > > If I figure out the use of minimal documented parts, I will add info to > it, if the info presented: > 1. would clarify the use > 2. would be correct > > I have been doing so for gb.report and will be doing so for every other > undocumented feature I might start using in the future, because I need > it myself. > > It isn't always easy figuring out how to use an undocumented feature. > It's mainly trial and error, time consuming and in the end never knowing > for sure if that is the way it is intended to be used. > > Anyway, count me in for helping improve the wiki. > I will, if and when I can. > > gbWilly > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user