2017-05-03 22:04 GMT-04:00 <d4t4f...@gmail.com>: > Also, in case you didn't know, Microsoft was one of the leading forces > behind drafting
yeah.. i use sybase the original software behind the SQL server and the only way to connect to its odbc (inclusivelly internally always used odbc bridgeds, so then m$ its reasonable to are behind that papers) > But anyway both MS and IBM (at least when I read the docs to make the > Gambas component work again) were kind enough to mark clearly any > deviations or differences from the standard in their ODBC docs. > u are the mantainer and author of the ODBC componet? i used extensivelly the ODBC component and i was thinking that i'm the only used deeply.. tomorrow i'll test again a SP that will retrieve a thousands of rows... (currently i make it with a dummy table, production will retrieve thousands) Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-05-03 22:09 GMT-04:00 <d4t4f...@gmail.com>: > Hehe... you're right. But I also cited IBM's ODBC docs for its DB2, and > you can also check Easysoft's excellent C tutorials at > http://www.easysoft.com/developer/languages/c/odbc_tutorial.html. > Speaking about Easysoft, I myself made a command line ODBC tool to connect > with ConnectionStrings and run queries in C with Easysoft's tutorials... > And I absolutely suck at C. That good are those tutorials! > > Also, in case you didn't know, Microsoft was one of the leading forces > behind drafting ODBC, as this quote from Wikipedia says: > > ODBC was originally developed by Microsoft and Progress DataDirect during > the early 1990s, and became the basis for the Call Level Interface (CLI) > standardized by SQL Access Group in the Unix and mainframe field. > > So by using their docs you know that that is the standard. Well, at least > theirs... They suck at Windows (and OS making and privacy respecting in > general), yes, but they sometimes pull nice tricks off their hats like > ODBC. And that is not the only standard they helped draft. > > But anyway both MS and IBM (at least when I read the docs to make the > Gambas component work again) were kind enough to mark clearly any > deviations or differences from the standard in their ODBC docs. > > Hope that helps, > zxMarce. > > On May 3, 2017, 21:20, at 21:20, bugtrac...@gambaswiki.org wrote: > >http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.1100&from=L21haW4- > > > >Comment #8 by PICCORO LENZ MCKAY: > > > >i noyed u only cited mocosoft papers.. dont know about mocosoft like > >papers.. mocosoft tendts to change everything depends of their > >convenience... > > > > > >odbc its today standardized by SQL Access Group in the Unix and > >mainframe field so please cited a right paper.. not windo/like > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user