Le 25/08/2017 à 11:22, Adrien Prokopowicz a écrit :
I would like to put my two cents on this subject (although,
disclaimer : I am not a professional in security).
First of all, the documentation of gb.crypt is completely wrong. As
Tobias says, its methods have *nothing* to do with encryption : ...
Not my fault:
$ man crypt
CRYPT(3)
NAME
crypt, crypt_r - password and data encryption
...
But you are right. The documentation should be updated with emphasis on
hashing instead of encryption, and an explanation of the risks.
And SHA-1 and SHA-2 are provided too for better security.
Regards,
--
Benoît Minisini
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
