On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:00:16PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hmmm... we have no_* for setting to false, and '-' (as prefix) for setting > > to > > none.... This is very confusing, as it doesn't work for values which are > > strings: > > Yes, it kind of is, unfortunately. But do we want to change things > again for 2.1? And how? > Maybe we could have just no_?
That sounds good, although I'd accept both ‘no_’ and ‘no-’ :) iustin
