On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote: > 2009/9/22 Iustin Pop <[email protected]>: > > While ‘test1’ matches both ‘test1’ and ‘test1.example’, it has a full, > > exact match and we should return it if that is the case. > > LGTM
thanks. > > Hmm, maybe commit to next instead? > > To my knowledge we didn't get any reports on problems with the old > behaviour. Better keep it consistent within 2.0.x. Agreed. The only reason I asked is that 2.0.x is broken if you create such instance today. But usually people won't ☺ iustin
