On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:21:16PM +0000, Guido Trotter wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> LGTM. >> >> Only one doubt: should we enable (by default) --no-ip-check >> automatically if one passes --no-name-check? Otherwise it seems you >> always have to pass both... > > Indeed you have to. I thought about doing that, but then I'm afraid this > will be a little dangerous? If you think it's not, then we can switch > it. I'll commit as is now and we can discuss it more. >
Ack on committing as is, for now, but I think it will be just confusing for people to have a failure on --no-name-check if they don't pass --no-ip-check... And since they're passing a --no-BLA-check anyway they should realize what it means... :) Guido
