On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Iustin Pop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:34:36PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote: >> The first can be problematic if poll(2) returns POLLHUP|POLLERR on a >> socket. Before it would be only be respected for SOCKOP_RECV, but since >> they can also occur on other socket operations, esp. in combination with >> OpenSSL, letting the socket functions handle POLLHUP|POLLERR seems to be >> the right thing. >> >> The second is a typo leading to an endless loop if the first line of an >> HTTP connection is empty (simply "\r\n"). Instead of removing the empty >> line, it would remove anything after it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <[email protected]> > > LGTM.
Should these be in stable-2.1? Thanks, Guido
