Am 1. Oktober 2010 15:31 schrieb Iustin Pop <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:19:33PM +0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote: >> This will be used by LUXI client programs to display the VG name. >> > > Ah, only now I see this is needed for 2/2. Mmm… it's a hardcoding of the > fact that we use *one* VG group. > > What do you think about simply fixing the LUs in the first place to > return complete LV info?
That would change the return value of OpVerifyDisks and we should avoid that in the middle of the 2.2 series. I agree for 2.3, but not 2.2. The latter can use this work-around as it won't get multi-VG support. Michael
