On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The current syntax when defining a NIC uses a pair of arguments, like this:
>
> -net tap,vlan=0 -net nic,vlan=0,model=virtio
>
> When using this pair, internally KVM will create a VLANState structure to send
> ethernet frames between the guest NIC and the host tap device. This is
> suboptimal and is going to be removed in the future. Plus, this combination
> breaks vhost-net support.
>
> The new syntax does not need the vlan craziness anymore, creating a direct 1:1
> relationship between the backend device and the frontend device.
>
> -netdev tap,id=netdev0 -device 
> virtio-net-pci,mac=52:54:00:56:6c:55,netdev=netdev0
>
> The current code does not verify if vhost_net is available before starting an
> instance. All this tests are done verifying the KVM version installed on the
> node.
>

Oh, nice, I was just thinking about this patch today!

> Signed-off-by: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py b/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py
> index 9816b35..942debb 100644
> --- a/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py
> +++ b/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py
> @@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ class KVMHypervisor(hv_base.BaseHypervisor):
>
>     kvm_cmd, kvm_nics, up_hvp = kvm_runtime
>     up_hvp = objects.FillDict(conf_hvp, up_hvp)
> +    _, _, v_min, _ = self._GetKVMVersion()
>
>     # We know it's safe to run as a different user upon migration, so we'll 
> use
>     # the latest conf, from conf_hvp.
> @@ -737,19 +738,33 @@ class KVMHypervisor(hv_base.BaseHypervisor):
>       tap_extra = ""
>       nic_type = up_hvp[constants.HV_NIC_TYPE]
>       if nic_type == constants.HT_NIC_PARAVIRTUAL:
> -        nic_model = "model=virtio"
> +        # From version 0.12.0, kvm uses a new sintax for network 
> configuration.
> +        if int(v_min) >= 12:


So when kvm releases 1.0.0 we start failing? No, we have to have a
"complete" version check! :)
For the rest, looks good! :)

Thanks,

Guido

Reply via email to