“kind” is already used in the field definition. “what” seems to be a better fit for the calls (“what should be queried?”).
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <[email protected]> --- doc/design-query2.rst | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/design-query2.rst b/doc/design-query2.rst index 9ba8746..f4b52a4 100644 --- a/doc/design-query2.rst +++ b/doc/design-query2.rst @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Request The request is a dictionary with the following entries: -``kind`` (string, required) +``what`` (string, required) An :ref:`item type <item-types>`. ``fields`` (list of strings, required) List of names of fields to return. Example:: @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ Request The request is a dictionary with the following entries: -``kind`` (string, required) +``what`` (string, required) An :ref:`item type <item-types>`. ``fields`` (list of strings, optional) List of names of fields to return. If not set, all fields are -- 1.7.3.1
