On 02/12/2013 03:19 PM, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Since it was very simple, interdiff:

Thanks! :)

(make lint didn't find any issues, but I didn't run make distcheck
though. Sorry.)

> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 6783e53..b6ebf49 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -991,7 +991,6 @@ TEST_FILES = \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/json_output_extra_matches.txt \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/json_output_no_matches.txt \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/json_output_ok.txt \
> -       test/data/bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_empty.txt \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_extra_matches.txt \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_no_matches.txt \
>         test/data/bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_ok.txt \
> diff --git a/test/py/ganeti.bdev_unittest.py b/test/py/ganeti.bdev_unittest.py
> index 1245965..8243375 100755
> --- a/test/py/ganeti.bdev_unittest.py
> +++ b/test/py/ganeti.bdev_unittest.py
> @@ -364,8 +364,8 @@ class TestRADOSBlockDevice(testutils.GanetiTestCase):
>        testutils.ReadTestData("bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_no_matches.txt")
>      self.plain_output_new_extra_matches = \
>        testutils.ReadTestData("bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_extra_matches.txt")
> -    self.plain_output_new_empty = \
> -      testutils.ReadTestData("bdev-rbd/plain_output_new_empty.txt")
> +    # This file is completely empty, and as such it's not shipped.
> +    self.plain_output_new_empty = ""
>      self.json_output_ok = 
> testutils.ReadTestData("bdev-rbd/json_output_ok.txt")
>      self.json_output_no_matches = \
>        testutils.ReadTestData("bdev-rbd/json_output_no_matches.txt")
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Guido Trotter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Stratos Psomadakis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2013 02:52 PM, Guido Trotter wrote:
>>>> This will need my extra commit to allow empty files to be shipped (sent as 
>>>> RFC).
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Hm, I didn't know about it. :/ I actually did that, because all the
>>> other 'output' data were stored in files. Setting
>>> self.plain_output_new_ok = "",  or even passing "" directly to the parse
>>> function would work fine too.
>>>
>> Would you like to update the patch to do that, then? :)
>> I suppose it might make things easier!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Guido
>>
>> PS make lint and make distcheck are your friends to notice these problems! :)
>
>
> --
> Guido Trotter
> Ganeti engineering
> Google Germany


-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<[email protected]>

Reply via email to