Am 25.07.13 13:47, schrieb Guido Trotter:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Sebastian Gebhard <[email protected]> wrote:
I would suggest to merge the functionality of vif-openvswitch into
vif-ganeti. This way users stay independent of whether they wanna use
vif-ganeti or vif-openvswitch.
+1. Not only, but also in net-common, so it can be used under kvm as well.
Ah well, that is actually what I ment to say. vif-ganeti merely contains
any functionality. All the functionality is in net-common, so this is
what I will be working on.
What are your thoughts about that? Do you see any issues I may have
overseen?
Also, I would base my future implementations (QoS for example) on this
structure.
Indeed, it would be good if the implementation was independent of
vif-openvswitch vs vif-ganeti, and of course compatible with all the
ganeti hypervisors, and not dependent on Xen.
Yes, the implementation will be in net-common, so it will be compatible
with all hypervisors that use it.
Thanks,
Guido
