On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Helga Velroyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Guido Trotter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Helga Velroyen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > This is an only slightly related patch to this series. >> > So far Ganeti printed a deprectation warning if someone >> > used the --no-lvm-storage. However, we don't want to >> > maintain it forever and thus we remove it completely >> > as well. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Helga Velroyen <[email protected]> >> >> Since this is just cli code, would it make sense to leave it there for >> at least another version? >> (Rationale, this is only part of the yet-to-be-released 2.9 version, >> so perhaps we should remove it after 2.9 is stable or rc?) > > > Hm, this patch is targeted for master, thus 2.10, doesn't that cover your > request that the deprecation note is still printed in 2.9 stable/rc? (Maybe > I am misunderstanding something here).
Let's say we leave it in for 2.9 and 2.10, and then remove it in 2.11, ok? I'm just worried it won't be seen "long enough" given that we have short releases now. Thanks, Guido
