LGTM, thanks

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Hrvoje Ribicic <[email protected]> wrote:

> A test relying on RAPI alone cannot exercise the RecreateInstanceDisks
> functionality properly - simply because it cannot damage an instance
> to the point where its disks would be missing and in need of
> recreation. The test is left standing simply to test if the operation
> is still exposed via the interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hrvoje Ribicic <[email protected]>
> ---
>  qa/rapi-workload.py | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/qa/rapi-workload.py b/qa/rapi-workload.py
> index 6d33802..7d9699d 100755
> --- a/qa/rapi-workload.py
> +++ b/qa/rapi-workload.py
> @@ -314,6 +314,9 @@ def TestSingleInstance(client, instance_name,
> alternate_name, node_one,
>
>    Finish(client, client.ActivateInstanceDisks, instance_name)
>
> +  # Note that the RecreateInstanceDisks command will always fail, as
> there is
> +  # no way to induce the necessary prerequisites (removal of LV) via RAPI.
> +  # Keeping it around allows us to at least know that it still exists.
>    Finish(client, client.RecreateInstanceDisks,
>           instance_name, [0], [node_one])
>
> --
> 1.8.5.1
>
>


-- 
-- 
Helga Velroyen | Software Engineer | [email protected] |

Google Germany GmbH
Dienerstr. 12
80331 München

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores

Reply via email to