LGTM, thanks

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Thrainer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Based on further feedback, I'd like to include this interdiff:
>
> diff --git a/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
> b/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
> index b1b2e2b..0cf0ded 100644
> --- a/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
> +++ b/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ The following tests are added to the QA:
>      return within a reasonable low timeout.
>    * For the maximum amount of instances in the cluster, submit add-,
>      remove- and list-tags jobs.
> +  * Submit 200 `gnt-debug delay` jobs with a delay of 1 seconds. To
> +    speed up submission, perform multiple job submissions in parallel.
> +    Verify that submitting jobs doesn't significantly slow down during
> +    the process. Verify that querying cluster information over CLI and
> +    RAPI succeeds in a timely fashion with the delay jobs
> +    running/queued.
>
>  Parallel job execution performance
>  ----------------------------------
> @@ -96,6 +102,11 @@ be added to cover more real-world use-cases. Also,
> based on user
>  requests, specially crafted performance tests modeling those workloads
>  can be added too.
>
> +Additionally, the correlations between job submission time and job
> +queue size could be detected. Therefore, a snapshot of the job queue
> +before job submission could be taken to measure job submission time
> +based on the jobs in the queue.
> +
>  .. vim: set textwidth=72 :
>  .. Local Variables:
>  .. mode: rst
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Thomas Thrainer <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Some changes to the design:
>>  * Instance remove jobs can't be submitted before create jobs are done,
>> so rectify this.
>>  * Add test of instance info jobs during heavy load on the cluster.
>>  * Add some more tests scenarios for the parallel instance creation test.
>>
>> @pudlak: Do you have comments on the design, since this was originally
>> your idea?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>> Interdiff:
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
>> b/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
>> index 1f804e0..b1b2e2b 100644
>> --- a/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
>> +++ b/doc/design-performance-tests.rst
>> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ two areas:
>>    * Parallel job execution performance. How well does Ganeti
>>      parallelize jobs?
>>
>> +Jobs are submitted to the job queue in sequential order, but the
>> +execution of the jobs runs in parallel. All job submissions must
>> +complete within a reasonable timeout.
>> +
>>  In order to make it easier to recognize performance related tests, all
>>   tests added in the context of this design get a description with a
>>  "PERFORMANCE: " prefix.
>> @@ -46,7 +50,7 @@ they are designed to run in a vcluster QA environment.
>>  The following tests are added to the QA:
>>
>>    * Submit the maximum amount of instance create jobs in parallel. As
>> -    soon as a creation job starts to run, submit a removal job for this
>> +    soon as a creation job succeeds, submit a removal job for this
>>      instance.
>>    * Submit as many instance create jobs as there are nodes in the
>>      cluster in parallel (for non-redundant instances). Removal jobs
>> @@ -58,7 +62,9 @@ The following tests are added to the QA:
>>    * For the maximum amount of instances in the cluster, submit multiple
>>      list and info jobs in parallel.
>>    * For the maximum amount of instances in the cluster, submit move
>> -    jobs in parallel.
>> +    jobs in parallel. While the move operations are running, get
>> +    instance information using info jobs. Those jobs are required to
>> +    return within a reasonable low timeout.
>>    * For the maximum amount of instances in the cluster, submit add-,
>>      remove- and list-tags jobs.
>>
>> @@ -76,10 +82,11 @@ The following tests are added to the QA:
>>
>>    * Submitting twice as many instance creation request as there are
>>       nodes in the cluster, using DRBD as disk template. As soon as a
>> -    creation job starts to run, submit a removal job for this instance.
>> +    creation job succeeds, submit a removal job for this instance.
>>     * Create an instance using DRBD. Fail it over, migrate it, recreate
>> -    its disk and change its secondary node while creating an additional
>> -    instance in parallel to each of those operations.
>> +    its disk, change its secondary node, reboot it and reinstall it
>> +    while creating an additional instance in parallel to each of those
>> +    operations.
>>
>>  Future work
>>  ===========
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Klaus Aehlig <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> > +Job queue performance
>>> > +---------------------
>>> > +
>>> > +Tests targeting the job queue should eliminate external factors (like
>>> > +network/disk performance or hypervisor delays) as much as possible, so
>>> > +they are designed to run in a vcluster QA environment.
>>>
>>> When testing the cost of Ganeti-internal communication only, it at
>>> least should be made sure, that daemons are not started in debug mode;
>>> the amount of details logged at debug level has increased significantly,
>>> so for the test to be meaningful, writing the debug-level entries to
>>> log files shouldn't be the bottleneck...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Klaus Aehlig
>>> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstr. 12, 80331 Muenchen
>>> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>>> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Thrainer | Software Engineer | [email protected] |
>>
>>  Google Germany GmbH
>> Dienerstr. 12
>> 80331 München
>>
>> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>> Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Thrainer | Software Engineer | [email protected] |
>
> Google Germany GmbH
> Dienerstr. 12
> 80331 München
>
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
>

Reply via email to