On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 05:31:56PM +0200, 'Helga Velroyen' via ganeti-devel 
wrote:
Testing the backend functions which update SSH keys is a
pain and maintaining the tests even more. Therefore, this
patch introduces a manager for all SSH key files of a
clusters (ganeti_pub_keys and authorized_keys). It
emulates all operations on these files for all nodes in
the cluster.

This has the following advantages:
- One can query the state of the entire cluster in a
 consisten way, for example "Do all nodes have this
 master candidates' key?" instead of tediously evaluating
 a history of mock calls.
- The file manager emulates both local changes in the
 master nodes' key files and changes on other nodes'
 key files using the ssh_update tool. This way, the
 state of the cluster ssh files is managed consistently
 no matter by what mechanism they were changed.
- The file manager offers a couple of convenience
 functions to set up the test data and to query their
 state after test operation.

Note that this might look like a lot of code, but it
vastly simplifies the current unit tests and it will
make future tests (for example for invalid calls) much
more easier. As it is a test utility, it is properly
documented to make it maintainable.

Signed-off-by: Helga Velroyen <[email protected]>
---
Makefile.am              |   1 +
test/py/testutils_ssh.py | 491 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 492 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 test/py/testutils_ssh.py

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 7312ea1..518eb2b 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ python_test_support = \
        test/py/__init__.py \
        test/py/lockperf.py \
        test/py/testutils.py \
+       test/py/testutils_ssh.py \
        test/py/mocks.py \
        test/py/cmdlib/__init__.py \
        test/py/cmdlib/testsupport/__init__.py \
diff --git a/test/py/testutils_ssh.py b/test/py/testutils_ssh.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e7edf8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/py/testutils_ssh.py
@@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python
+#
+
+# Copyright (C) 2010, 2013, 2015 Google Inc.
+# All rights reserved.
+#
+# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+# met:
+#
+# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
+# this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+#
+# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
+# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
+# documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+#
+# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS
+# IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
+# TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+# PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR
+# CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
+# EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
+# PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
+# PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
+# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
+# NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
+# SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+
+"""Helper class to test ssh-related code."""
+
+from ganeti import constants
+from ganeti import pathutils
+
+
+class FakeSshFileManager(object):
+  """Class which 'fakes' the lowest layer of SSH key manipulation.
+
+  There are various operations which touch the nodes' SSH keys and their
+  respective key files (authorized_keys and ganeti_pub_keys). Those are
+  tedious to test as file operations have to be mocked on different levels
+  (direct access to the authorized_keys and ganeti_pub_keys) of the master
+  node, indirect access to those files of the non-master nodes (via the
+  ssh_update tool). In order to make unit tests of those operations more
+  readable and managable, we introduce this class, which mocks all
+  direct and indirect access to SSH key files on all nodes. This way,
+  the state of this FakeSshFileManager represents the state of a cluster's
+  nodes' SSH key files in a consise and easily accessible way.
+
+  """
+  def __init__(self):
+    # Dictionary mapping node name to node properties. The properties
+    # are a tuple of (node_uuid, ssh_key, is_potential_master_candidate,
+    # is_master_candidate, is_master).
+    self._all_node_data = {}

Perhaps it'd be easier from a long-term maintenance perpsective to have a dedicated class instead of 5-tuple). It'd be easier to extend, if needed, field names would be more descriptive than just tuples, and some method signatures might get simler. Or perhaps a class created by `namedtuple(...)` would be a good option. But I'd leave it as your call, what do you think it's better, I'm not that Python expert.

+    # Dictionary emulating the authorized keys files of all nodes. The
+    # indices of the dictionary are the node names, the values are lists
+    # of keys (strings).
+    self._authorized_keys = {}

Is there a reason for using lists as values instead of sets? For example to keep the order of the keys? Just it seems that using sets would simplify a lot of code below (add if not present, remove etc.).

+    # Dictionary emulating the public keys file of all nodes. The indices
+    # of the dictionary are the node names where the public key file is
+    # 'located' (if it wasn't faked). The values of the dictionary are
+    # dictionaries itself. Each of those dictionaries is indexed by the
+    # node UUIDs mapping to a list of public keys.
+    self._public_keys = {} # dict of dicts
+    # Node name of the master node
+    self._master_node_name = None
+
+  def _SetMasterNodeName(self):
+    self._master_node_name = [name for name, (_, _, _, _, master)
+                              in self._all_node_data.items() if master][0]
+
+  def GetMasterNodeName(self):
+    return self._master_node_name
+
+  def _CreateNodeDict(self, num_nodes, num_pot_mcs, num_mcs):
+    """Creates a dictionary of all nodes and their properties."""
+
+    self._all_node_data = {}
+    for i in range(num_nodes):
+      name = "node_name_%i" % i
+      uuid = "node_uuid_%i" % i
+      key = "key%s" % i
+      self._public_keys[name] = {}
+      self._authorized_keys[name] = []
+
+      pot_mc = None
+      if i in range(num_pot_mcs):
+        pot_mc = True
+      else:
+        pot_mc = False

Could be replaced by

  pot_mc = i < num_pot_mcs

+
+      mc = None
+      if i in range(num_mcs):
+        mc = True
+      else:
+        mc = False

.. also here.

+
+      master = None
+      if i == num_mcs / 2:
+        master = True
+      else:
+        master = False

also here - master = i == num_mcs / 2

+
+      self._all_node_data[name] = (uuid, key, pot_mc, mc, master)
+
+  def _FillPublicKeyOfOneNode(self, receiving_node_name):
+    _, _, is_pot_mc, _, _ = self._all_node_data[receiving_node_name]
+    # Nodes which are not potential master candidates receive no keys
+    if not is_pot_mc:
+      return
+    for uuid, key, pot_mc, _, _ in self._all_node_data.values():
+      if pot_mc:
+        self._public_keys[receiving_node_name][uuid] = key
+
+  def _FillAuthorizedKeyOfOneNode(self, receiving_node_name):
+    for _, key, _, mc, _ in self._all_node_data.values():
+      if mc:
+        self._authorized_keys[receiving_node_name].append(key)
+
+  def InitAllNodes(self, num_nodes, num_pot_mcs, num_mcs):
+    """Initializes the entire state of the cluster wrt SSH keys.
+
+    @type num_nodes: int
+    @param num_nodes: number of nodes in the cluster
+    @type num_pot_mcs: int
+    @param num_pot_mcs: number of potential master candidates in the cluster
+    @type num_mcs: in
+    @param num_mcs: number of master candidates in the cluster.
+
+    """
+    self._public_keys = {}
+    self._authorized_keys = {}
+    self._CreateNodeDict(num_nodes, num_pot_mcs, num_mcs)
+    for node in self._all_node_data.keys():
+      self._FillPublicKeyOfOneNode(node)
+      self._FillAuthorizedKeyOfOneNode(node)
+    self._SetMasterNodeName()
+
+  def GetSshPortMap(self, port):
+    """Creates a SSH port map with all nodes mapped to the given port.
+
+    @type port: int
+    @param port: SSH port number for all nodes
+
+    """
+    port_map = {}
+    for node in self._all_node_data.keys():
+      port_map[node] = port
+    return port_map
+
+  def GetAllNodeNames(self):
+    return self._all_node_data.keys()
+
+  def GetAllPotentialMasterCandidateNodeNames(self):
+    return [name for name, (_, _, pot_mc, _, _)
+            in self._all_node_data.items() if pot_mc]
+
+  def GetAllMasterCandidateUuids(self):
+    return [uuid for uuid, _, _, mc, _
+            in self._all_node_data.values() if mc]
+
+  def GetAllPotentialMasterCandidates(self):
+    return [(name, uuid, key, pot_mc, mc, master)
+            for name, (uuid, key, pot_mc, mc, master)
+            in self._all_node_data.items() if pot_mc]
+
+  def SetOrAddNode(self, name, uuid, key, pot_mc, mc, master):
+    """Adds a new node to the state of the file manager.
+
+    This is necessary when testing to add new nodes to the cluster. Otherwise
+    this new node's state would not be evaluated properly with the assertion
+    fuctions.
+
+    @type name: string
+    @param name: name of the new node
+    @type uuid: string
+    @param uuid: UUID of the new node
+    @type key: string
+    @param key: SSH key of the new node
+    @type pot_mc: boolean
+    @param pot_mc: whether the new node is a potential master candidate
+    @type mc: boolean
+    @param mc: whether the new node is a master candidate
+    @type master: boolean
+    @param master: whether the new node is the master
+
+    """
+    self._all_node_data[name] = (uuid, key, pot_mc, mc, master)
+    if name not in self._authorized_keys:
+      self._authorized_keys[name] = []
+    if mc:
+      if not key in self._authorized_keys[name]:
+        self._authorized_keys[name].append(key)
+    if name not in self._public_keys:
+      self._public_keys[name] = {}
+
+  def NodeHasPublicKey(self, file_node_name, key_node_uuid, key):
+    """Checks whether a node has another node's public key.
+
+    @type file_node_name: string
+    @param file_node_name: name of the node whose public key file is inspected
+    @type key_node_uuid: string
+    @param key_node_uuid: UUID of the node whose key is checked for
+    @rtype: boolean
+    @return: True if the key_node's UUID is found with the machting key 'key'
+
+    """
+    for (node_uuid, pub_keys) in self._public_keys[file_node_name].items():
+      if key in pub_keys and key_node_uuid == node_uuid:
+        return True
+    return False
+
+  def NodeHasAuthorizedKey(self, file_node_name, key):
+    """Checks whether a node has a particular key in its authorized_keys file.
+
+    @type file_node_name: string
+    @param file_node_name: name of the node whose authorized_key file is
+      inspected
+    @type key: string
+    @param key: key which is expected to be found in the node's authorized_key
+      file
+    @rtype: boolean
+    @return: True if the key is found in the node's authorized_key file
+
+    """
+    return key in self._authorized_keys[file_node_name]
+
+  def AllNodesHaveAuthorizedKey(self, key):
+    """Check if all nodes have a particular key in their auth. keys file.
+
+    @type key: string
+    @param key: key exptected to be present in all node's authorized_keys file
+    @rtype: boolean
+    @return: True if key is present in all node's authorized_keys file
+
+    """
+    for name in self._all_node_data.keys():
+      node_auth_keys = self._authorized_keys[name]
+      if key not in node_auth_keys:

Just nitpicking, probably not necessary to assign the variable, could be directly in `if` (also applies to other methods below), but I'm not sure what's more idiomatic Python.

+        raise Exception("Node '%s' does not have the key '%s' in its"
+                        " 'authorized_keys' file." % (name, key))
+    return True

I'm a bit puzzled by the output of the method. It'd expect it to either return True/False (like in the following method), or have no return value and throw the exception if a key is missing. Currently it returns true or throws the exception, so the return value has no use.

+
+  def NoNodeHasAuthorizedKey(self, key):
+    """Check if none of the nodes has a particular key in their auth. keys 
file.
+
+    @type key: string
+    @param key: key exptected to be present in all node's authorized_keys file
+    @rtype: boolean
+    @return: True if key is not present in all node's authorized_keys file
+
+    """
+    for name in self._all_node_data.keys():
+      node_auth_keys = self._authorized_keys[name]
+      if key in node_auth_keys:
+        return False
+    return True
+
+  def NoNodeHasPublicKey(self, uuid, key):
+    """Check if none of the nodes have the given public key in their file.
+
+    @type uuid: string
+    @param uuid: UUID of the node whose key is looked for
+    @type key: string
+    @param key: SSH key to be looked for
+
+    """
+    for name in self._all_node_data.keys():
+      node_pub_keys = self._public_keys[name]
+      if (uuid, key) in node_pub_keys.items():
+        return False
+    return True
+
+  def PotentialMasterCandidatesOnlyHavePublicKey(self, query_node_name):
+    """Checks if the node's key is on all potential master candidates only.
+
+    This ensures that the node's key is in all public key files of all
+    potential master candidates, and it also checks whether the key is
+    *not* in all other nodes's key files.
+
+    @param query_node_name: name of the node whose key is expected to be
+                            in the public key file of all potential master
+                            candidates
+    @type query_node_name: string
+
+    """
+    query_node_uuid, query_node_key, _, _, _ = \
+        self._all_node_data[query_node_name]
+    for name, (_, _, pot_mc, _, _) in self._all_node_data.items():
+      has_key = self.NodeHasPublicKey(name, query_node_uuid, query_node_key)
+      if pot_mc:
+        if not has_key:
+          raise Exception("Potential master candidate '%s' does not have the"
+                          " key.")
+      else:
+        if has_key:
+          raise Exception("Normal node (not potential master candidate) '%s'"
+                          " does have the key, although it should not have.")
+
+  # Disabling a pylint warning about unused parameters. Those need
+  # to be here to properly mock the real methods.
+  # pylint: disable=W0613
+  def RunCommand(self, cluster_name, node, base_cmd, port, data,
+                 debug=False, verbose=False, use_cluster_key=False,
+                 ask_key=False, strict_host_check=False,
+                 ensure_version=False):
+    """This emulates ssh.RunSshCmdWithStdin calling ssh_update.
+
+    While in real SSH operations, ssh.RunSshCmdWithStdin is called
+    with the command ssh_update to manipulate a remote node's SSH
+    key files (authorized_keys and ganeti_pub_key) file, this method
+    emulates the operation by manipulating only its internal dictionaries
+    of SSH keys. No actual key files of any node is touched.
+
+    """
+    assert base_cmd == pathutils.SSH_UPDATE
+
+    if constants.SSHS_SSH_AUTHORIZED_KEYS in data:
+      instructions_auth = data[constants.SSHS_SSH_AUTHORIZED_KEYS]
+      self._HandleAuthorizedKeys(instructions_auth, node)
+    if constants.SSHS_SSH_PUBLIC_KEYS in data:
+      instructions_pub = data[constants.SSHS_SSH_PUBLIC_KEYS]
+      self._HandlePublicKeys(instructions_pub, node)
+  # pylint: enable=W0613
+
+  def _EnsureAuthKeyFile(self, file_node_name):
+    if file_node_name not in self._authorized_keys:
+      self._authorized_keys[file_node_name] = []
+
+  def _AddAuthorizedKey(self, file_node_name, ssh_key):
+    self._EnsureAuthKeyFile(file_node_name)
+    if not ssh_key in self._authorized_keys[file_node_name]:
+      self._authorized_keys[file_node_name].append(ssh_key)
+
+  def _RemoveAuthorizedKey(self, file_node_name, key):
+    self._EnsureAuthKeyFile(file_node_name)
+    self._authorized_keys[file_node_name][:] = \
+        [k for k in self._authorized_keys[file_node_name] if k != key]
+
+  def _HandleAuthorizedKeys(self, instructions, node):
+    (action, authorized_keys) = instructions
+    ssh_keys = []
+    for ssh_key in authorized_keys.values():
+      ssh_keys.append(ssh_key)

Could this be replaced by just

  ssh_keys = authorized_keys.values()

?

+    if action == constants.SSHS_ADD:
+      for ssh_key in ssh_keys:
+        self._AddAuthorizedKey(node, ssh_key)
+    elif action == constants.SSHS_REMOVE:
+      for ssh_key in ssh_keys:
+        self._RemoveAuthorizedKey(node, ssh_key)
+    else:
+      raise Exception("Unsupported action: %s" % action)
+
+  def _EnsurePublicKeyFile(self, file_node_name):
+    if file_node_name not in self._public_keys:
+      self._public_keys[file_node_name] = {}
+
+  def _ClearPublicKeys(self, file_node_name):
+    self._public_keys[file_node_name] = {}
+
+  def _OverridePublicKeys(self, ssh_keys, file_node_name):
+    self._ClearPublicKeys(file_node_name)
+    for key_node_uuid, node_keys in ssh_keys.items():
+      if key_node_uuid in self._public_keys[file_node_name]:
+        raise Exception("Duplicate node in ssh_update data.")
+      self._public_keys[file_node_name][key_node_uuid] = node_keys
+
+  def _AddPublicKeys(self, public_keys, file_node_name):
+    self._EnsurePublicKeyFile(file_node_name)
+    for key_node_uuid, keys in public_keys.items():
+      self._public_keys[file_node_name][key_node_uuid] = keys
+
+  def _ReplaceOrAddPublicKeys(self, public_keys, file_node_name):
+    self._EnsurePublicKeyFile(file_node_name)
+    for key_node_uuid, keys in public_keys.items():
+      self._public_keys[file_node_name][key_node_uuid] = keys

These two methods seem to me to be the same, perhaps some check is missing in the first one?

+
+  def _RemovePublicKeys(self, public_keys, file_node_name):
+    self._EnsurePublicKeyFile(file_node_name)
+    for key_node_uuid, _ in public_keys.items():
+      if key_node_uuid in self._public_keys[file_node_name]:
+        self._public_keys[file_node_name][key_node_uuid] = []
+
+  def _HandlePublicKeys(self, instructions, node):
+    (action, public_keys) = instructions
+    if action == constants.SSHS_OVERRIDE:
+      self._OverridePublicKeys(public_keys, node)
+    elif action == constants.SSHS_ADD:
+      self._AddPublicKeys(public_keys, node)
+    elif action == constants.SSHS_REPLACE_OR_ADD:
+      self._ReplaceOrAddPublicKeys(public_keys, node)
+    elif action == constants.SSHS_REMOVE:
+      self._RemovePublicKeys(public_keys, node)
+    elif action == constants.SSHS_CLEAR:
+      self._ClearPublicKeys(node)
+    else:
+      raise Exception("Unsupported action: %s." % action)
+
+  # pylint: disable=W0613
+  def AddAuthorizedKeys(self, file_obj, keys):
+    """Emulates ssh.AddAuthorizedKeys on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: C{ssh.AddAuthorizedKeys}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    for key in keys:
+      self._AddAuthorizedKey(self._master_node_name, key)
+
+  def RemoveAuthorizedKeys(self, file_name, keys):
+    """Emulates ssh.RemoveAuthorizeKeys on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: C{ssh.RemoveAuthorizedKeys}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    for key in keys:
+      self._RemoveAuthorizedKey(self._master_node_name, key)
+
+  def AddPublicKey(self, new_uuid, new_key, **kwargs):
+    """Emulates ssh.AddPublicKey on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: C{ssh.AddPublicKey}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    key_dict = {new_uuid: new_key}
+    self._AddPublicKeys(key_dict, self._master_node_name)
+
+  def RemovePublicKey(self, target_uuid, **kwargs):
+    """Emulates ssh.RemovePublicKey on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: {ssh.RemovePublicKey}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    key_dict = {target_uuid: []}
+    self._RemovePublicKeys(key_dict, self._master_node_name)
+
+  def QueryPubKeyFile(self, target_uuids, **kwargs):
+    """Emulates ssh.QueryPubKeyFile on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: C{ssh.QueryPubKey}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    all_keys = target_uuids is None
+    if all_keys:
+      return self._public_keys[self._master_node_name]
+
+    if isinstance(target_uuids, str):
+      target_uuids = [target_uuids]
+    result_dict = {}
+    for key_node_uuid, key in \
+        self._public_keys[self._master_node_name].items():
+      if key_node_uuid in target_uuids:
+        result_dict[key_node_uuid] = key
+    return result_dict
+
+  def ReplaceNameByUuid(self, node_uuid, node_name, **kwargs):
+    """Emulates ssh.ReplaceNameByUuid on the master node.
+
+    Instead of actually mainpulating the authorized_keys file, this method
+    keeps the state of the file in a dictionary in memory.
+
+    @see: C{ssh.ReplacenameByUuid}
+
+    """
+    assert self._master_node_name
+    if node_name in self._public_keys[self._master_node_name]:
+      self._public_keys[self._master_node_name][node_uuid] = \
+        self._public_keys[self._master_node_name][node_name][:]
+      del self._public_keys[self._master_node_name][node_name]
+  # pylint: enable=W0613
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c


Rest LGTM

Reply via email to