Very nice, I like this a lot better.

I noticed another minor thing.  The table on the left side of the
cluster & meta view plots is not handled in the same way.  In the web
browser that I am using, this causes the CPU Totals and Avg Load
information to be wrapped on the cluster view making it harder to read. 
I looked at the code and found that they are even handled differently in
the way the code uses the templates.  Perhaps this should be changed to
be more consistent.  To find what I am talking about, just look for
cluster_load in the files and compare how meta_view.php/meta_view.tpl &
cluster_view.php/cluster_view.tpl work for that table.  The meta_view
template was setting the class to footer causing it to use a smaller
font and not line wrap on my browser.

Also, what is this new pie chart thing, it doesn't seem to work for me?

~Jason

PS. What are the future plans for the port 8652 interface?  Will it only
be used by the webfrontend or will gmetad use it also?


On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 13:22, Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
> I just checked in changes that incorporate many of your suggestions. I 
> still need to solve the overall summary chatter, but I have found the 
> bug (in gmetad - thread synchronization) and I am working on the fix.
> 
> But this webfrontend works well. It puts the dead nodes on top of the 
> cluster view, and tells when they last sent a heartbeat. The graphs are 
> bigger, with the "now" value, etc.
> 
> -fds
> 
> On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 08:36 AM, Jason A. Smith wrote:
> 
> > I just tried the latest gmetad & webfrontend from cvs to test out the
> > improved page load speed and other features and have a few comments:
> >
> > First, the grid summary totals appear to be messed up in gmetad.  Both
> > the rrds and xml data constantly display/report fluctuating numbers.  
> > Is
> > this a known bug, have you seen this in your tests?
> >
> > I like the new more compact cluster view that gets rid of the colored
> > node icons and just colors the plots instead, but I think the small
> > graphs are a little too small.  They are so small that often rrdtool
> > doesn't even add any labels to the horizontal & vertical axis, and the
> > actual plot area takes up a very small portion of the total image area.
> > Also, I think removing the legend is a mistake, it was useful for us to
> > be able to see the value "now".  Sometimes one node goes out of control
> > reporting loads over 100 and setting the vertical range to accommodate
> > the highest max value means the other plots are useless, especially 
> > with
> > no "now" value displayed.
> >
> > I think dead nodes should be shown at the top of the cluster list, not
> > the bottom, because it is important info, just like high load is.  If
> > you have a large cluster then you don't want to have to scroll all the
> > way to the bottom to see if there are any dead nodes.  For dead nodes,
> > it would also be nice if the last reported time was shown without 
> > having
> > to go to the node view, and shown as a human readable timestamp.  The
> > last heartbeat doesn't seem to work when the node is listed as dead, I
> > thought it worked before.  Also, the text table showing the cpu and 
> > load
> > averages is often too narrow making it hard to read when it wraps
> > repeatedly.  This seems to vary depending on the browser use, I tried
> > the old netscape and mozilla.
> >
> > What is required for the pie charts?  They don't work for me at all.
> >
> > One last minor comment, why was the default_range changed to a day?  I
> > think an hour is much more useful and don't think the page needs to
> > reload itself every 300 seconds if the default range is set to 24 
> > hours.
> >
> > ~Jason
> >
> > PS. What is wrong with sourceforge lately, I keep getting broken
> > connections when trying to access their cvs server?
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > /------------------------------------------------------------------\
> > |  Jason A. Smith                          Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> > |  Atlas Computing Facility, Bldg. 510M    Phone:  (631)344-4226   |
> > |  Brookhaven National Lab, P.O. Box 5000  Fax:    (631)344-7616   |
> > |  Upton, NY 11973-5000                                            |
> > \------------------------------------------------------------------/
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: If flattening out C++ or Java
> > code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful,
> > don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software.
> > http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ganglia-developers mailing list
> > Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
> >
> Federico
> 
> Rocks Cluster Group, San Diego Supercomputing Center, CA
-- 
/------------------------------------------------------------------\
|  Jason A. Smith                          Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  Atlas Computing Facility, Bldg. 510M    Phone:  (631)344-4226   |
|  Brookhaven National Lab, P.O. Box 5000  Fax:    (631)344-7616   |
|  Upton, NY 11973-5000                                            |
\------------------------------------------------------------------/


Reply via email to