Hi there.

Just following up on my earlier post. Has anyone had a chance to try out my 
amended solaris.c??

----
Yemi


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adesanya, Adeyemi 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Ganglia-developers] Running as non-root on Solaris 
> solved (I think)
> 
> 
> 
> To the Ganglia development team:
> 
> Here's my modified solaris.c file. Give it a go and see if it 
> works OK for you. I'm running Solaris 5.9 .
> 
> ----
> Yemi
> 
> On 1/5/04 6:49 PM, "steven wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, I must have been on vacation or something.
> > 
> > Regardless, I don't have this code.
> > 
> > And for the record, I never said I was happy about having 
> to run gmond 
> > as root instead of nobody.  :)
> > 
> > Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
> >> Hi Christopher.
> >> 
> >> I have not received a response from Steven Wagner so I 
> will sent this 
> >> message to the ganglia-developers list (where it belongs). 
> I am keen 
> >> to get these changes added to the ganglia because running gmond in 
> >> root mode is a risk that many net security teams are unwilling to 
> >> take.
> >> 
> >> Can someone responsible for the gmond code please respond? 
> I'd love 
> >> to send you my modified solaris.c file for testing/evaluation.
> >> 
> >> ----
> >> Yemi
> >> 
> >> On 12/15/03 1:29 PM, "Christopher Fitch" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> Hello all,
> >>> in response to this message:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Steven.
> >>> 
> >>> I spent some time digging through man pages and I have now 
> >>> eliminated the need for kvm in solaris.c (no more root 
> permissions!! 
> >>> Our security experts can breathe a sigh of
> >>> relief!!)
> >>> I figured out how to get the statistics from kstat and modified 
> >>> solaris.c accordingly . I¹ll send you my solaris.c once 
> I¹ve cleaned 
> >>> it up and ran a few more tests.
> >>> 
> >>> I tried it on Solaris 5.9 but I will try it on 5.8 too.
> >>> 
> >>> -----
> >>> Yemi
> >>> 
> >>> Is this fix available now? I am running into this problem 
> as I write 
> >>> this, and I
> >>> would appreciate being able to get the fix.
> >>> 
> >>> :)
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to