Hi Matt: On 12/14/07, Matthew Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When we discussed this before I predicted that SVG would reduce server > side computation and network bandwidth usage while increasing client > side computation, but it's great to see hard numbers Jesse, nice testing > there. :) Unfortunately, Bernard is probably right that rrdtool's SVG > output currently won't be very consistent between browsers (I don't > think very many people use rrdtool SVG output, but I might be able to > put some work in to rrdtool to stabilize the SVG output between > browsers). The worst problem I think though would be embedding the SVG > graphs within an HTML page. That is probably the least consistent thing > between browsers: since IE uses the Adobe SVG viewer plugin it needs a > different embedding method than Firefox and Opera which have native SVG > support. I don't know what Safari is like for SVG support. I think > there are a few solutions for abstracting the embed method so that it is > browser-independent, but I'm probably not the best person to go to on > that since I've never even used SVG embedding except for seeing some > tutorials that do it. :) I think it would be great if you can work on rrdtool's SVG consistency "issue". It would benefit all the projects which use rrdtool for its graphing capabilities. Thanks, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
