Greetings, while preparing a bootstrap environment which could be used to generate maintenance releases for the 3.0.x branch noticed we'd been using different versions for autotools that the ones detailed in README.SVNusers (which match the ones used by 2.5.7), as shown by the following table :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 2.5.7 | 3.0.0 | 3.0.1 | 3.0.2 | 3.0.3 | 3.0.4 | 3.0.5 | 3.0.6 | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| | automake | 1.6.3 | 1.6.3 | 1.6.3 | 1.9.5 | 1.9.5 | 1.9.5 | 1.9.6 | 1.9.2 | | autoconf | 2.53 | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.59 | | libtool | 1.4.2 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | 1.5.8 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Should the documentation be updated?, and which are the recommend versions to use that are supported in all development workstations? Carlo PS. seems the versions from 3.0.6 match Centos 4.6 and a clean bootstrap there is close enough to the release tar.gz (minor differences in apr because of ./configure apparently skipped there for the release package) to consider it the source, is this then the reference development environment? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
