Hi Jesse: On 2/8/08, Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we seem to be tossing out minor web front end patches tonight, > here's one that fixes the persistent "0 - 0.00" that shows up on all > of the per-metric graphs. The patch applies against 3.0.6 and trunk. > The new behavior is to do the following: > > * If an explicit vertical label is passed, use it. > * If a valid maximum or minimum value has been passed, via the 'x' or > 'n' URL parameters respectively, use them. > * If neither are passed, suppress printing a vertical label alltogether. > > Note that there should be *something* printed as a label for alignment > purposes. Otherwise, the sizes of the graphs are off by a few pixels, > and it looks really bad. Not sure if this is the correct way to fix this, see: http://ganglia01.slac.stanford.edu:8080/ganglia/glast/?c=glastlnx&m=&r=hour&s=descending&hc=4 In older releases, the vertical label actually did something -- with your patch, it simply removed it (for the load graph). In the graphs from SLAC, it is labelled 0 - 8.0, however, I'm not sure whether this information is simply redundant or not. Since I am not aware of the history of the vertical labels, perhaps folks like Matt, Martin or even Jason (who filed the original bug #37) can comment on this. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
