Hi Timothy: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Witham, Timothy D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How frustrating. This passed my initial test case. But when I put it > in production, a few "dips" came back only on my largest grid graphs. > Running my test loop for more time does reveal low sums, but they seem > quicker and less frequent than before, making the error harder to catch. > So the mutex changes are apparently still not perfect. > > Carlo: your changes look good to me and it seems like it should be an > improvement over the way it was before. But the original code with my > original patch never reports a low sum. Any ideas what might be > missing? For what for it's worth, I no longer see dips for my installation after I patched, or at least "not noticeable". Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
