On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:12:46PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: > >>> On 7/10/2008 at 2:06 PM, in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse Becker" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 15:48, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> On 7/10/2008 at 12:52 PM, in message > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse Becker" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> This is exactly what "contrib" directories are for: things that are > >>> useful and worth distributing as a courtesy, but are *not* directly > >> > >> So what does that mean? Should contrib/ be part of the tarballs, > >> snapshots, > > releases or just an SVN repository location for misc. stuff? > > > > Yes. There usually isn't a lot of churn in contrib/ directories, nor > > are the contents large. Having them in SVN makes sure that they > > aren't lost, or mistakenly omitted. Putting them in tarballs/releases > > makes sure that they are distributed (which is the whole point). > > > > So are we OK with distributing everything that is currently in contrib/ > directory?
If it gets voted for backport as explained in the STATUS page for next release (not 3.1.0) Any package from trunk will include contrib in the package since r1538 anyway. Carlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
