On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Vladimir Vuksan <vli...@veus.hr> wrote: > I think you guys are complicating much :-). Can't you simply have multiple > gmetads in different sites poll a single gmond. That way if one gmetad fails > data is still available and updated on the other gmetads. That is what we > used to do.
Would you mind explaining me why having multiple gmetads in different colos pulling form the same gmond is simpler than the infrastructure I presented in my post? Furthermore, could you please show me how your simpler solution addresses the problem of bringing back up the gmetad that failed such has both gmetads would have the same data? And if that's not what you had in mind, what's your strategy? Which data is going to be displayed to the user? and what if the first gmetad that didn't fail now fail while the restored one continues working? thanks for your clarifications. -- "Behind every great man there's a great backpack" - B. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
