> and technical correctness. There are two key points to > this proposal: a) that there be an overall editor who has > the final say over the contents of the document and b) > that I am that editor. I care much more about point (a) > than point (b) though I'd like to think I'm pretty well > qualified for the task. Shall we give it a try? Anyone > else want the job? Worst case, if it doesn't work out, is > you depose me and appoint a new editor or forget this > whole editor foolishness and write a collectively edited > FAQ on the Wiki.
Peter, this sounds great. Just tell us where do you need a hand. Benjamin _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
