On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, at 09:41 pm, Brad Beveridge wrote: > How does McClim (http://common-lisp.net/project/mcclim/) stack up? > Any consumer reports on this? >
McCLIM doesn't contain any automated documentation support if that's what you mean. In general though I think McCLIM is fine if you're based on an X system; otherwise, not so good (or plain unavailable). This is correctable (by writing back ends) but is non-trivial. -Duncan > Cheers > Brad > > On 12/14/05, Erik Enge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 12/14/05, Surendra Singhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> A lisp documentation tool (maybe an extension of `Albert'), >>> something like >>> javadoc which can read lisp files and generate xhtml docs, will be >>> also very >>> useful. This should be a separate project, but it is something which >>> IMHO will >>> help all lisp programmers/libraries. >> >> In a month or so, common-lisp.net will automatically generate >> documentation for all projects with a .asd file every night using >> <http://common-lisp.net/project/cldoc>. >> >> Erik. >> _______________________________________________ >> Gardeners mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners >> > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
