Marco Antoniotti wrote: > "Reporting back to the group" is no substitute for "reporting to the > author". James Anderson has been very helpful
Actually, he replied, and you are correct, he's helpful. I was of the mind to not bother the author with my learning curve, but now I'm glad I copied him on the first mail. > and usually loading > CL-XML just involves loading > > /your/path/to/cl-xml/code/load.lisp > > ... after spending some time back on this path, I was able to get further. The tests aren't running, but the lib loaded. > Having tried before to change the load machinery of CL-XML (and decided > it was a time sink) I would just advise to use it "as is". Loading the > library is easy enough (although I have not tried it with the latest > SBCL), and, IMHO, a much bigger priority for CL-XML (and a much more > difficult one) is to improve its documentation. I now agree, and will change my Gardeners project to documentation... Thanks _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
